Analog Computers

Reference / Paper · 1967

Study of Electrical Analogue for Electrodialysis

Read the PDF (171 pp) ↗

Office of Saline Water Research and Development Progress Report No. 238 (February 1967), prepared by the Astropower Laboratory of Douglas Aircraft Company. Develops a mathematical electrical-network analogue model of the electrodialysis desalination process, decomposing each stage into resistive sub-elements (concentration polarization, ohmic polarization, membrane resistance, electrode polarization, and parasitic duct losses). Applies the model to operating plants at Webster, South Dakota and Buckeye, Arizona, achieving agreement within 94% of measured stack resistance, and projects 15-45% resistance reductions through improved hydrodynamics and advanced membranes.

Manufacturer
US Department of the Interior / Office of Saline Water
Author
C. Berger, G. A. Guter, G. Belfort
Year
1967
Type
Reference / Paper
Language
English
Learning track
specific applications
Pages
171
Credit
Digitized by Google / HathiTrust; Public Domain.
Museum
analogmuseum.org ↗
  • US Department of the Interior / Office of Saline Water
  • electrical analogue
  • electrodialysis
  • desalination
  • membrane resistance

← Back to the Reference Library

Study of Electrical Analogue for Electrodialysis

_r / DOCUMENT:.- Study of Electrical Analogue for Electrodialysis Generated on 2015-10-13 04:52 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google United States Department of the Interior iv. of Tutaa Univ Office of Saline Water • Research and Development Ubrarr Progress Report No. 238 196? Generated on 2015-10-13 04:52 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google Research and Development Progress Report No. 238 • February 1967 Study of Electrical Analogue for Electrodialysis By C. Berger, G. A. Guter, G. Belfort, Astropower Laboratory, Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc., Newport Beach, California, for Office of Saline Water; J. A. Hunter, Acting Director; K. C. Channabasappa, Chief, Membrane Division, M. E. Mattson, Generated on 2015-10-13 04:52 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google Project Engineer UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • Stewart L Udall, Secretary Frank C. Di Luzio, Assistant Secretary for Water Pollution Control Generated on 2015-10-13 04:52 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google Created in 1849, the Department of the Inter ior — America's Department of Natural Resources—is concerned with the management, conservation, and development of the Nation's water, wildlife, mineral, forest, and park and recreational resources. It also has major responsibilities for Indian and Territorial affairs. As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the of the Interior works to assure that nonrenewable resources are developed and used wisely, that park and recrea tional resources are conserved for the future, and that renewable Department resources perity, their full contribution to the progress, pros security of the United States—now and in the future. make and Generated on 2015-10-13 04:52 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google FOREWORD This is the two hundred and thirty eighth of a series of reports designed to present accounts of progress in saline water conversion with the expectation that the exchange of such data will contribute to the long-range development of economical processes applicable to largescale, low-cost demineralization of sea or other saline water . Except for minor editing, the data herein are as contained in the reports submitted by the Astropower Laboratory, Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc. under Contract No. 14-01-0001The data and conclusions given in this report are 676. essentially those of the contractor and are not necessarily endorsed by the Departmerit of the Interior. ABSTRACT The highlight accomplishments of the program are as follows: 1. This study is a first attempt to perform an analysis of electrodialysis by considering the process as an electrical network composed of resistive elements representative of various electro chemical subprocesses . The total effect of all subprocesses is unified into the single mathematical equation for the network. This study represents a step of major magnitude in understanding the electrodialysis process because of the novel engineering equations developed that can be used to quantitatively analyze the electrical resistance of the stages in an electrodialysis plant. The treat ment gives a breakdown of the various factors that contribute to electrical resistance and pinpoints those factors that must be improved to make technological improvements in the process. 2. Application of the analysis to the Webster, S. D. and Buckeye, Arizona, plants enables the resistance of the separate stages to be calculated. The average calculated values for the six stages of these plants agree to within 94% of the average measured values. 3. The major resistive factors found in the operation of the above plants are electrolyte resistance, ohmic polarization Recommendations (due primarily to scale) and membrane potentials. are made to reduce the latter two factors. resistive elements were found to be membrane electrode polarization, and parasitic duct losses. The membrane resistance in the first stage at Webster, S. D. , It represents about two percent of the total stack resistance. is recommended that polarization effects be reduced even at the expense of increasing these minor resistive contributions, if 4. Generated on 2015-10-13 04:52 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google resistance, The minor necessary. 5. The electrical characteristics of the Webster and Buckeye plants were calculated based on assumed technological advances which can be made in operating techniques, improved hydrodynamics and use of exotic membranes. was found that It reductions in electrical resistance of from 15 to are possible using these advances. 45 percent 6. The resistive elements of a hypothetical sea water plant were also calculated by the method developed in this study. The results indicate that membrane resistance becomes an important factor. In the future, development of membranes for sea water use, low membrane resistance as well as reduction in ohmic polarization is a justifiable goal. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2. 0 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES AND SUMMARY 3 2. 1 2. 2 2.3 2.4 2. 5 3. 0 Program Objectives Summary of Specific Accomplishments Summary of Program Results Recommendations 3 4 11 Personnel 14 ELECTRICAL ANALOGUE STUDIES 3. 1 15 Phase I — Subcomponent Analysis 3. 1. 1 3.1.2 3.1.2.2 3. 1. 2. 3 3. 1.2.4 3. 1. 2. 5 3.1.4 3. 1.4. 1 3. 1. 4. 3 34 34 35 35 38 38 42 R Resistance Analogue of Electrical Duct Losses 48 48 50 50 Discussion 50 Membrane Potential Membrane Selectivity 55 58 Discussion 58 Selectivity 59 Terrmerature Effects 60 3. 1. 7. 1 3. 1. 7. 2 3. 1. 8 Concentration Overpotential Chemical Overpotential Ohmic Overpotential Cathodic Resistance Analogue Anodic Resistance Analogue Total Channel Resistance, Cell Pair Resistance, RD 15 27 32 Water Transfer Processes 3. 1. 5. 1 3.1.6 3.1.7 Concentration Polarization Estimation of Ohmic Polarization Composite Cell Pair Resistance Parasitic Electrical Duct Losses 3.1.4.2 3. 1. 5 15 Electrode Polarization 3. 1. 2. 1 3. 1.3 15 Membrane Polarization 3. 1. 1. 1 3. 1. 1. 2 Generated on 2015-10-13 04:53 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google 3 Resistance Analogue of Membrane iii Page 3. 2 Phase II — Integration of Subcomponent Mathematical Elements into a General Analytical Expression 3.2. 1 3.2.2 3. 3 Development of General Mathematical Analogue Power Index Phase III — Application of Generalized Mathematics Solution to Specific Situations 3.3.1 Calculation of the Concentration Polarization 3.3.2 3.3.3 Estimation of Ohmic Polarization Calculation of Electrode Polarization Calculation of Resistance Due to the Overall Cell Pair Calculation of the Parasitic Duct Loss 3. 3. 4 3. 3. 5 at the Membrane Surfaces Resistance 3. 3. 6 3. 3. 7 3. 3. 8 3.3.9 Generated on 2015-10-13 04:53 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google 67 74 86 89 94 104 109 3.3.9.1 111 Operating Characteristics Mathematical Determination of 109 110 111 .. Ill Electrodialysis of Projected Plants 114 Concentration Polarization Ohmic Polarization Composite Cell Pair 3.3. 10.4 Membrane Polarization 3.3.10.5 Neglected Effects 114 115 115 115 115 Discussion of Calculated Values 115 3. 3. 10. i operating 1 3.3.10.2 3.3.10.3 3.3.11 62 62 Calculation of the Corrected Coulomb Efficiency Based Solely on the Water Transfer Processes Calculation of Resistance Due to Membrane Selectivity Calculation of Resistance Due to Membrane Potential Electrodialysis of Sea Water 3. 3. 9. 2 3.3. 10 62 STATEMENT OF INVENTION 118 REFERENCES 119 APPENDIX A - Colloidal Coagulation APPENDIX B — Theoretical Prediction of Membrane Resistance Combining the Statistical Theory of Meares, et al. , and Spiegler's Formation Factor IV Generated on 2015-10-13 04:53 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google APPENDIX C - Hydro dynamic Flow APPENDIX D - Nomenclature LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1 2 3 4 Simplified Schematic of Cell Pair Resistive Network Boundary Film Thickness as a Function of Volumetric Rate of Flow Diagram of the Concentration Profile and the Diffusion Layer on Each Side of an Electrodialysis Ion Exchange _ Membrane /. ' \ Plot of the Correction Factor I ( ^1 C. F. =7: I ) r 4-Of1 (him) 25 °C 17 19 I J Versus Temperature of Fluids at Various Product 5 6 7 22 Constants A and B (From Onsager Equation) Versus Temperature °C 26 Relationship Between Rate of Resistance Change and Reciprocal of Stack Current 29 Linear Relationship Between Rate of Resistance Change and Stack Current 30 of Membrane Polarization 8 Development 9 Comparison of Resistances in Electrode Compartments 36 Various Overvoltages at Electrodes 39 10 11 12 Generated on 2015-10-13 04:53 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google Concentrations Representative Electrical Network of a Multicompartment Electrodialysis Unit "Reduced" Electrical Network of a Multicompartment Electrodialysis Unit 13 Schematic View of Current Leakage 14 Plot of the Leakage Fractionl-: — I Versus the Normalized Channel Resistance Ratio 15 16 17 18 19 (W) o 33 43 44 45 46 Dimensions of Electrodialysis Unit Required for Electrical Leakage Model 47a Various Simultaneous Processes Occurring During Electrodialytic Separation 51 Water Transfer From Dialysate to Brine per Gram Equivalent of Salt Transport 52 Water Transfer as a Function of Current Density in a Cationic Membrane 53 Ratio Tf/T/j.., for Various Values of Water Transferred (W ) and Cproduct Dialysate Concentration at Start, (C ,). when = °" 01 <drinking water> 56 VI Figure 20 Equivalent Resistance Circuits for a Single Cell Pair 63 21 Equivalent Circuit for Electrodialysis Process 64 Electrical Schematic cf Current Resistance Losses in a Membrane Cell Pair Flow Sheet and Material Balance for Electrodialysis 66 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Generated on 2015-10-13 04:53 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google Page 32 33 34 35 36 37 Plant at Webster, So. Dakota 69 Flow Sheet and Material Balance for Electrodialysis Plant at Buckeye, Arizona 70 Schematic of the Mark III (Ionics Inc. ) Spacer 75 Plot of Equivalent Conductance Versus Average Solution Concentration for Various Temperatures. Derived from the Onsager Equation 79 Plot of Equivalent Conductance Versus Average Solution Concentration for Various Temperatures. Derived from the Onsager Equation 80 Plot of Equivalent Conductance Versus Average Solution Concentration for Various Temperatures. Derived from the Onsager Equation 81 Plot of Equivalent Conductance Versus Average Solution Concentration for Various Temperatures. Derived from the Onsager Equation 82 Plot of Equivalent Conductance Versus Average Solution Concentration for Various Temperatures. Derived from the Onsager Equation 83 Plot of Equivalent Conductance Versus Average Solution Concentration for Various Temperatures. Derived from the Onsager Equation 84 Variation of Concentration Polarization With the Normalised Operating Current Density for the Electrodialysis Plants at Webster* S. D. and Buckeye, Arizona Concentration Profiles oi the Electrode, Buffer and Adjacent Streams at Webster, South Dakota 88 90 Concentration Profiles of the Electrode and Adjacent Streams at Buckeye, Arizona 91 Concentration Profiles of the Dialysate and Brine Streams 98a Resistivity of Ion Exchange Membranes and Sodium Chloride Solutions 102 Mass Balance of the Dialysate and Brine Streams for Stage IV, Webster, South Dakota 105 Figure 38 Generated on 2015-10-13 04:53 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google 39 Page Channel Dimensions of Brine and Dialysate Streams as Shown by a Dialysate Gasket, from the Stack at Webster, South Dakota 108 Flow Sheet and Material Balance for Hypothetical Sea Water Plant With Buckeye, Arizona, Conditions Equipment and 113 vin LIST OF TABLES Table I JJ IV Cell Pair Resistance of Webster Plant Cell Pair Resistance of Buckeye Plant Cell Pair Resistance of Projected Plants Cell Pair Resistance of Sea Water Plants 10 V Separator and Channel Dimensions 18 VI Comparison of Calculated and Observed Ohmic Resistance Change with Time 31 Summary of the Important Mathematical Relationships Used in Phase III (Derived in Section 3. 1) — Application of Generalized Mathematical Equations to Specific Situations 68 III VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII Generated on 2015-10-13 04:53 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google Page XIV XV XVI XVTI XVIII XIX XX 7 8 9 Array of Data Used as Inputs for the Electrodialysis Electrical Analogue Model for the Present Webster Plant Array of Data Used as Inputs for the Electrodialysis Electrical Analogue Model for the Present Buckeye Plant Array of Data Used as Inputs for the Electrodialysis Electrical Analogue Model for the Sea Water Plant 73 Concentration Polarization in the Brine and Dialysate Streams Using the Computed Double Integration Method 77 Concentration Polarization Computed Using the Double Integration Method 87 Detailed Brine, Catholyte, Anolyte and Buffer Material Balances for the Electrodialysis Plant at Webster, South Dakota 92 Detailed Electrode Material Balances for the Electrodialysis Plant at Buckeye, Arizona 93 Resistance Analogue Evaluation for the Anode and Cathode (Plus Buffer Stream at Webster, South Dakota) Compartments 95 Detailed Dialysate Material Balances for the Electrodialysis Plant at Webster, South Dakota Detailed Dialysate Material Balances for the Electrodialysis Plant at Buckeye, Arizona Detailed Brine Material Balances for the Electrodialysis Plant at Buckeye, Arizona 71 72 96 97 98 Summary of the Solution and Membrane Resistances Per Cell Pair 103 Major Constituents of Sea Water 112 ix Generated on 2015-10-13 04:53 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google 1.0 INTRODUCTION This is the final report of work under Contract 14-01-0001-676. analytical engineering study of the electrodialysis An process was performed and appropriate mathematical expressions were derived and applied to the calcu lation of the resistance of electrodialysis of conditions. plants operating under a given set The computed values are close to the actual plant operating values and indicate for the first time a quantitative breakdown and relative importance of the various factors which contribute to the electrical resistance. Previous to this study no unified treatment of the electrodialysis had been made. There did exist a large number of theoretical and laboratory studies on various subprocesses of electrodialysis. Engineering studies had also been made designed to give total operating costs of electrodialysis and process costs of product water. plants In the latter studies, stack resistance assumed a minor role and did not require an analytical treatment. This study differs from former studies in that it is centered on the many electrochemical proc esses that constitute electrodialysis teristics. and contribute to stack operating charac This study constitutes a preliminary attempt to analyze the operation of an electrodialysis plant by reducing all associated factors to an electrical resistance and unifies these factors by placing them in a network of resistive elements representative of the electrodialysis process. Generated on 2015-10-13 04:53 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google The major objective of this study is to develop mathematical equations of an electrical network that is analogous to the electrodialysis process and that can be applied to both projected and present electrodialysis plants. The generalized equations contain parameters of operating plants and will facilitate computing the processing costs for a given water supply and set of operating parameters. The equations describe the resistive elements equivalent to discrete phenomena or subprocesses such as concentration polarization, ohmic polarization, bulk stream resistance, membrane resistance, electrical losses through ducts, water transfer processes, and membrane potentials. This approach has provided a step of major magnitude in the under standing of electrodialysis analytical tod, plant operation. This study has resulted in an applicable not only to the analysis of the operation of large plants but the results pinpoint those technological advances in the processes which are required to lower plant operating costs and expand the utility of the process. In this report each of the various resistive elements is discussed separately, and a resistance analogue expression is derived for each. area resistance equivalent for each factor is calculated. The The area resistances are then combined to give a total area resistance of a single cell pair. This procedure is applied to the electrodialysis plants at Webster, South Dakota; Buckeye, Arizona; technology. a sea water plant; and a plant using assumed advanced Recommendations concerning specific aspects of the electro- Generated on 2015-10-13 04:54 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google dialysis process are given as a result of the calculations for the various plants. 2. 0 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES AND SUMMARY Program Objectives 2. 1 The objectives of this study are as follows: Formulate a general mathematical equation for electrodialysis by developing a unified electrical analogy concept in which critical component and subcomponent factors are represented in terms of an electrical resistance network. 2. Develop specific guidelines for future research and develop ment work in improving electrodialysis technology by applying the equation to specific situations and determining how the variations in operating parameters and other vari ables influence performance and operating costs. Summary of Specific Accomplishments 2. 2 1. the 1. Engineering equations were derived that can be used to calculate electrodialysis stack resistance and electrical operating costs if various operating parameters are known such as, water compositions, temperature, types of membranes, stack design, limiting current, operating current, flow rates, etc. 2. The use of the derived equations gives a breakdown of and allows comparison of separate resistive components of the total process. This breakdown lists electrolyte resistance, resistance due to scale formation a magnitude and membrane polarization among the major resistive membrane resistance and membrane concentration polarization among the Generated on 2015-10-13 04:54 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google relatively unimportant factors. of the total elements and places Electrolyte resistance represents one-third cell pair resistance for brackish water and two-thirds is due to a number of various polarization 3. effects. This study resulted in a number of recommendations for directing technical efforts to improve the electrodialysis process. These recommenda tions are listed below in Section 2. 3. 4. Most of the resistive elements were calculated by integrating complex equations on a digital computer. Consequently, highly refined values were obtained and effects of changes in stack design can be readily evaluated. operating 5. An empirical correlation was made between ohmic polarization, time and current density. Equations were derived and applied to operating plants. Estimates of ohmic polarization, which may involve phenomena such as scaling, fouling, and internal membrane changes, are quite high and suggest ohmic polarization as one of the most important and least understood of the membrane phenomena investigated. Summary of Program Results 2. 3 The objectives of this program were achieved by a four-phase study. During Phase I, Subcomponent Analysis, mathematical expressions were developed based on electrical analogies for each of the subcomponent factors influencing the operation of an electrodialysis considered were concentration polarization, selectivity, membrane polarization, system. The factors ohmic polarization, membrane resistance, parasitic electrical losses, water transfer processes, membrane polarization, and electrode and dialysate resistance, concentrate The effects of hydro - electrode polarization. dynamic factors and temperature were included. The derivation of electrical resistive equations for each of the above factors is given in Section 3. 0, Electrical Analogue Studies. Membrane, concentrate and dialysate resistances were combined into a single expression, designated as composite cell pair resistance. This expression, as well as that developed for membrane con parasitic duct losses, centration polarization, transfer, membrane polarization, and membrane electrode polarization, into computer language to facilitate computations and to grations over the cross-sectional area of a membrane water were translated perform double inte stack. A tool for studying design effects on these various resistive elements was thus intro duced and successfully employed. During Phase II, Integration of Subcomponent Mathematical Elements into a General Analytical Expression, the interrelationships between resistive elements was studied and their combination into a general ex pression for a resistance network was accomplished. An expression for total stack resistance was then written in terms of the separate resistive elements the and their combination into a resistance network. A simplified version of the resistance network for a single cell pair is given in Figure 1. current through an electrodialysis currents ift Generated on 2015-10-13 04:59 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google selectivity, and The total stack is the sum of i , , i_, and i_. The i- represent processes that do not actually conduct a current, Generated on 2015-10-13 05:00 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google however, their effect is to lower the efficiency of the desalting current, i^; parallel in the network. cell pair resistance is then easily obtained from the algebraic expression for the total resistance of the network consisting of R, through R_. Resistances R0 consequently, they are placed in through R, can be broken down to further series The or parallel networks. A power index, P., for a given stack design was then defined pi • iR AC -V- n) where i is the stack current, R the stack resistance, and efficiency and AC is the change in dialysate concentration. of the resistive elements the as R? and R~ in Figure power cost required for electrodialysis 1. r\ is the current The latter consists This index is proportional to processing. A comparison of power indexes is possible for stacks of various designs, when product water rate, feed water concentration, and amount of total dissolved solids removed are held constant. Under Phase III, Applications of Generalized Mathematical Solu tion to Specific Situations, the expression for the derived resistance network was applied to specific plant situations at Webster, South Dakota; Buckeye, Arizona; a hypothetical sea water plant; and a projected plant based on assumed advances in electrodialysis technology. A description of the calculation and Generated on 2015-10-13 05:00 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google combination of the resistive elements is given in detail in Section 3. 3 of this report. A tabulation of results and comparison with the actual values are given in Tables I, II, III, and IV. The separate resistive component values are listed as well as their combined values. The calculations using assumed A advanced technology is based on the Webster, South Dakota plant design. comparison can thus be made of the present plant and what might be expected if certain advances are made in membrane performance, scale elimination, reduction of concentration polarization and membrane potentials. Under Phase IV, recommendations on specific guidelines for future research and development work in improving electrodialysis were made. These recommendations technology are based on the analysis of the Webster and Buckeye plants, projected plants, and a hypothetical sea water plant. Recommendations are given below. Generated on 2015-10-13 05:00 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google 4* (4 •H 0 (X * o u C5 . (M 0 0 0^ ro CO ^0 00 ^* (3^ — PO oo oN o r- . -" f<i 2 > 3 0e 0 O 0 co' rt '{4 It ro I\) -H -4 fj* NO m PO a u PO oo r~ cu u r. •H t> NO r~ O — CO <U M 4, * i— ,-j 1 ^ O I •> •4-1M U h U It) g 3 It —' c O (O u nl M 5.0 s 2 t> (M -1 I 00 G IV ft NO C O h •0 44 u r-^ Memb Polari: 2 0 •o 0 0 00 v 3 a O. 1 H 0 •a^ .4* 4* •r* '3 H u (4 Q £ K id _O H 0 0 o 44 h 06 t\i oo 0N <J H O1 & O ariz rO m' o ^ N § CM it 4* ^* 2 **4 n)'C BUCKE ^ od £ 0 u OQ a m O H-1 0,'8 g *^ •9 75 a .. p j3 9 CU u K n i H O J Generated on 2015-10-13 05:00 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google N y 0 aj T3 O *H in co ** •O O oo >ri •o CU W o <, .'< u -1-4 05 Generated on 2015-10-13 05:00 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google ,X 0) ! £ T o c -1 OH .... sO T}* o 00 —« rO CO o in OO ^ r o co — c o -H 4) U C rt 4-1 •r-*fll 0) 4J oj rt OS "3 JH ^ T*• r- PO •^ in O O^ so g3 o rt* so CJ f c f — ,—i is u W Hi "o ifl 0, 2 3 V O s !2 0 « 2 T3 '£ O ft b N O h 0} ^H -H f^ in [**• o c M ao o* Tf o» CO *** tj•^ 4)u ^ ^" N H w ro r*h- r*r^J PO rO O -H 07s PC * f I\3 r^j a •—* o rf O LD 00 O f" (V •fi n) c l3 ft .2 c M _ O rO O f") O rO O rO C r/* 4) O. ^J NO CT^ O O O CS LTl 00 if C a o Lfl ^J i/l -*' | -S *J ^ ^ cO "Q ft Tt a Is" •r* V 4) * 1 C o IC • i«4«H w a^ ^^ U o o <M rO in CO sD Tf r*oc 00 ^~* ^H (s] ^^ IM f««. ^* Q11 CC u a -u B At Ol —1 4) U ^ tt a. (M u 4) (0 PS fc n 0, h O PL, 0-3 (0 •o C s£ <t iT> ^ O O 6 It ." O o1 * -•t NC rO '« 2 c Q W QJ p u n)^ a V M O J W bJ f st I o K C o W — CO « QN >. •ft Generated on 2015-10-13 05:00 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google o e 5 O u. CO di "o nj .2 > «£ J3 ^ W H II W K > (0 10 Recommendations 2. 4 As a result of this study a number of recommendations concerning the electro'dialysis process can be made. 1 . The elimination or substantial reduction of ohmic polariza tion would significantly improve the economy of the process. the least understood of all those subprocesses encountered This factor is in this study. Although ohmic polarization is complex in nature, there appears to be no theoretical reason for not expecting improvement in this area. Ohmic polari zation is considered to be due to build up of hard and soft scale, flocs, and opposing potentials that can build up within the membranes. Improving the hydrodynamic flow at the membrane surface would reduce the diffusion layer concentration gradient and prevent formation of the hydroxide ion responsible for precipitation of hydroxides in the concentrate streams. There appears to be a relationship between spacer design and scale formation as indicated by an examination of used membranes which show scale formation occuring at specific locations relative to the spacer mesh. This relationship between local hydrodynamic flow and scale formation should be investigated. Another approach for reducing ohmic polarization is to develop selective anion membranes to lower or limit the conduction of scale and floc Generated on 2015-10-13 05:00 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google forming ions into the concentrate stream. Work on cation membranes selec tive for calcium and magnesium has been considered in the past and appears feasible. It is reasonable to extend this approach The extremes to which membrane to anion membranes development as well. for reduction of ohmic polarization can be carried is indicated by the relative effects of mem brane resistance and ohmic polarization. Table I and Table IV give composite cell pair resistance for the four stages at Webster, S. D. The calculations were based on the assumption that membrane resistance for the projected plant (Table IV) was 50 percent of the membranes now in use (Table I). How ever, the composite cell pair resistance for Stage I differs only by two percent because most of the resistance is offered by the electrolyte streams. development In the of the selective membranes, it may be necessary to sacrifice 11 good membrane conductivity for specific selectivity provided advantages of reducing polarization effects can be gained. Methods of reducing membrane 2. to_ potentials must be considered gain significant reduction in_ electrical power costs. Membrane potentials arise due to concentration differences across the membrane coupled with selective transport properties and are augmented by concentration gradients in the diffusion layers adjacent to the membrane. Elimination of the latter concentration gradients was assumed in calculating membrane potentials for the projected plants as given in Table IV. The latter values can be considered the lower limits obtainable with ideal flow conditions resulting in the elimina tion of the diffusion layer. A better understanding of the influence of spacer design on local hydrodynamic flow is required as an initial step to more effec tive spacer design. Concentration gradients can also be discharged by intro ducing pulsing and current by other investigators. reversal techniques as has already been suggested Studies, however, must be made to determine the magnitude of the advantages gained because current reversal will drastically reduce current efficiency. Analytic al studies to optimize plant design should be made. 3 . The breakdown of total stack resistance and capability to calculate separate resistive elements can readily be adopted to optimization of plant design and Generated on 2015-10-13 05:01 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google operating procedures. As was discussed above, the development of scale resistant membranes may require sacrificing good membrane conductivity. Once the characteristics of membranes are established, optimization of Another obvious optimization is membrane membrane choice can be made. potential. The method of feeding a multistage plant will influence both mem in an opposite manner. The two stages at the Buckeye plant use series feed for each of the inlet streams brane potential and electrolyte resistance giving a greater membrane potential in the last stage than in the first due to larger concentration differences across the membrane. If series feed were used for the dialysate stream and parallel feed for the concentrate, as is done at Webster, branes lower concentration gradients would exist across the mem resulting in lower membrane potentials. Alterations in method of feed will also change electrolyte stream resistance and scaling tendencies. The latter is due to changes in calcium 12 and magnesium ion concentration in the concentrate when different feed patterns are introduced. elements have common factors, stream which will occur Because many of the resistive design alterations optimum for one may not necessarily guarantee optimization for the other factors, or their net result. Optimization of design is possible, however, when all resistive factors are considered simultaneously as can be done by the general network equation derived in this study. 4. Data from operating plants must be obtained to further refine and develop more extensive and meaningful electrical analogue expres sions. Although OSW contractors were extremely helpful in providing data presently available on the operations of their plants, it was found that a vast amount of data remain unknown. Knowledge of water analyses and how it varies with stack performance, analyses of electrode streams and water transport data are few or lacking completely. As discussed above, the ohmic polarization factor is one of the most important resistive components. However, only a two-parameter equation based on empirical correlations was found to approximate this factor. Certainly, this phenomenon must be influenced by several factors such as spacer design and hydrodynamics, tem perature, nature of the membrane, the presence of certain anions and cations in addition to calcium and magnesium, flow rate, pretreatment, feed method and suspended solids. There are far more variables that should be considered Generated on 2015-10-13 05:01 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google and which require much more plant operating data to more fully understand the ohmic polarization terms. 5. Membrane research must be pursued from the standpoint of reducing both short and long term polarization effects. Membrane resist ance is a minor consideration in seeking these improvements. Polarization effects determine cost factors exclusive of the electrical power costs. and floc formation require special operating procedures, Scale pretreatment, pulsing, acid backwashing, membrane breakage, and replacement. Advanced membranes that can aid in the reduction of these costly factors need not exhibit low membrane resistance because of the insignificance of the latter electrical power costs approxi mate less than ten percent of the total cost picture for electrodialysis factor compared to total operating cost. processing. The Membrane resistance in the first stage at Webster, 13 South Dakota is about one percent of the total stack resistance. Certainly, sacrifices in membrane conductivity can justifiably be made reduce the to scaling problems. 6. The above recommendations of an effective advanced study using the of the (3) and (4) can be the subjects electrical analogue approach. Much required data for refinement of the study can be obtained using a portable 1000 GPD test stack which can be operated at a number of sites having different feed waters. Completion and refinement of the optimization equations could then be used to optimize a test stack design for each site or water type. Operation and testing the optimized designs at the various sites would be a final phase of the program. The use of any advanced electro- dialysis technologies such as inorganic membranes, procedures and special operating such as pulsing and current reversal should definitely be a part of this program. 2. 5 Personnel Astropower personnel who participated in this study are Dr. C. Berger, principal investigator , Dr. G. A. Guter and Mr. G. Belfort. Dr. K. S. Spiegler participated in this study as consultant to Astropower. Generated on 2015-10-13 05:01 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google Mr. Robert Hubata of Astropower assisted with some of the calculations. 14 3. 0 ELECTRICAL ANALOGUE STUDIES 3. 1 Phase I — Subcomponent Analysis A discussion and review of a number of subcomponent factors of the electrodialysis process will be undertaken in this section. For each sub component factor, the resistance-analogue (ohms-cm /cell pair), will be preceded by a summary of the present state of the art. These resistance values are combined and calculated in Sections 3. Z and 3. 3 using data obtained from the electrodialysis plants at Webster, South Dakota, and Buckeye, Arizona. 3. 1. 1 Membrane Polarization Extensive experimental work has been, done to quantitatively and is being, explain the phenomena of membrane polarization. The dialyzing current faces a two-fold polarization effect close to the membrane surface. A concentration gradient across the diffusion layer and scale for mation are the respective causes of such polarization. The former is termed concentration polarization while the latter is called ohmic polarization. Each is separately discussed and evaluated below. 3. 1. 1. 1 Concentration Polarization It is possible to estimate the approximate resistance due to concentration polarization that the dialyzing current faces, Generated on 2015-10-13 05:01 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015078505586 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google provided two important system parameters can be calculated. These are the thickness (6) of and the concentration gradient and profile across the diffusion layer. Several empirical approaches, use of the Chilton-Colburn (4) such as transfer factors and the flux equation of Fick, are able to predict the diffusion layer thickness for nonspace-filled compartments. Because in all practical electrodialysing plants spacers or turbulent promoters are used, these theoretical equations are not applicable. H. P. Gregor, et. al. have studied and measured experimentally, using various size spacers at different compartment flow rates and Reynolds numbers, the re lation of the diffusion layer-thickness relationship, with flow rates. Figure Z depicts this while Table V provides the channel and spacer dimensions. 15 For flow rates greater than half a gallon per minute, 6 , the diffusion layer thickness, can be predicted from the straight line relationship obtained from the lower curve in Figure 2, viz, 6 = 30 - 10. 7 Q